Health professionals’ willingness to share responsibility and strengthen interprofessional collaboration: a cross-sectional survey | BMC Medical Education
Lee JK, McCutcheon LRM, Fazel MT, Cooley JH, Slack MK. Assessment of Interprofessional Collaborative Practices and outcomes in adults with diabetes and hypertension in primary care: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2036725.
Google Scholar
Wagner EH, Flinter M, Hsu C, Cromp D, Austin BT, Etz R, et al. Effective team-based primary care: observations from innovative practices. BMC Fam Pract. 2017;18:13.
Google Scholar
Espinoza P, Peduzzi M, Agreli HF, Sutherland MA. Interprofessional team member’s satisfaction: a mixed methods study of a Chilean hospital. Hum Resour Health. 2018;16:30.
Google Scholar
Körner M, Wirtz MA, Bengel J, Göritz AS. Relationship of organizational culture, teamwork and job satisfaction in interprofessional teams. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:243.
Google Scholar
Labrague LJ, Al Sabei S, Al Rawajfah O, AbuAlRub R, Burney I. Interprofessional collaboration as a mediator in the relationship between nurse work environment, patient safety outcomes and job satisfaction among nurses. J Nurs Manag. 2022;30:268–78.
Google Scholar
Baker L, Egan-Lee E, Martimianakis MA, Reeves S. Relationships of power: implications for interprofessional education. J Interprof Care. 2011;25:98–104.
Google Scholar
Ganotice FA, Gill H, Fung JTC, Wong JKT, Tipoe GL. Autonomous motivation explains interprofessional education outcomes. Med Educ. 2021;55:701–12.
Google Scholar
Olson R, Bialocerkowski A. Interprofessional education in allied health: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2014;48:236–46.
Google Scholar
Paradis E, Whitehead CR. Louder than words: power and conflict in interprofessional education articles, 1954–2013. Med Educ. 2015;49:399–407.
Google Scholar
Freeth DS, Hammick M, Reeves S, Koppel I, Barr H. Effective interprofessional education: development, delivery, and evaluation. Wiley Online Library; 2005.
Bodenheimer T, Ghorob A, Willard-Grace R, Grumbach K. The 10 building blocks of high-performing primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12:166–71.
Google Scholar
Bollen A, Harrison R, Aslani P, van Haastregt JCM. Factors influencing interprofessional collaboration between community pharmacists and general practitioners—A systematic review. Health Soc Care Community. 2019;27:e189–212.
Google Scholar
McInnes S, Peters K, Bonney A, Halcomb E. An integrative review of facilitators and barriers influencing collaboration and teamwork between general practitioners and nurses working in general practice. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71:1973–85.
Google Scholar
Perron D, Parent K, Gaboury I, Bergeron DA. Characteristics, barriers and facilitators of initiatives to develop interprofessional collaboration in rural and remote primary healthcare facilities: a scoping review. Rural Remote Health. 2022;22:7566.
Rawlinson C, Carron T, Cohidon C, Arditi C, Hong QN, Pluye P, et al. An overview of reviews on Interprofessional Collaboration in primary care: barriers and facilitators. Int J Integr Care. 2021;21:32.
Google Scholar
van der Gulden R, Haan NDS, Greijn CM, Looman N, Tromp F, Dielissen PW. Interprofessional education and collaboration between general practitioner trainees and practice nurses in providing chronic care; a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20:290.
Google Scholar
Whitehead C. The doctor dilemma in interprofessional education and care: how and why will physicians collaborate? Med Educ. 2007;41:1010–6.
Google Scholar
Henneman EA, Lee JL, Cohen JI. Collaboration: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 1995;21:103–9.
Google Scholar
Holm S. Final responsibility for treatment choice: the proper role of medical doctors? Health Expect. 2011;14:201–9.
Google Scholar
D’Amour D, Goulet L, Labadie JF, Martin-Rodriguez LS, Pineault R. A model and typology of collaboration between professionals in healthcare organizations. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:188.
Google Scholar
King N, Ross A. Professional identities and interprofessional relations: evaluation of collaborative community schemes. Soc Work Health Care. 2004;38:51–72.
Google Scholar
van Duin TS, de Carvalho Filho MA, Pype PF, Borgmann S, Olovsson MH, Jaarsma ADC, et al. Junior doctors’ experiences with interprofessional collaboration: wandering the landscape. Med Educ. 2022;56:418–31.
Google Scholar
Gilles I, Filliettaz SS, Berchtold P, Peytremann-Bridevaux I. Financial barriers decrease benefits of interprofessional collaboration within integrated care programs: results of a nationwide survey. Int J Integr Care. 2020;20:10.
Google Scholar
Weller JM, Barrow M, Gasquoine S. Interprofessional collaboration among junior doctors and nurses in the hospital setting. Med Educ. 2011;45:478–87.
Google Scholar
Aase I, Hansen BS, Aase K. Norwegian nursing and medical students’ perception of interprofessional teamwork: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:170.
Google Scholar
Sangaleti C, Schveitzer MC, Peduzzi M, Zoboli ELCP, Soares CB. Experiences and shared meaning of teamwork and interprofessional collaboration among health care professionals in primary health care settings: a systematic review. JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Rep. 2017;15:2723–88.
Google Scholar
Nancarrow SA, Booth A, Ariss S, Smith T, Enderby P, Roots A. Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work. Hum Resour Health. 2013;11:19.
Google Scholar
Dictionary.com | Meanings & Definitions of English Words. Dictionary.com. 2024. Accessed 6 Oct 2024.
Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:179–211.
Google Scholar
Przymuszała P, Szmelter J, Zielińska-Tomczak Ł, Cerbin-Koczorowska M, Marciniak R. Future physicians’ behavioral intentions towards collaborative practice – a qualitative study on Polish final-year medical students guided by the theory of planned behavior. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23:151.
Google Scholar
Zielińska-Tomczak Ł, Cerbin-Koczorowska M, Przymuszała P, Marciniak R. How to effectively promote interprofessional collaboration? – a qualitative study on physicians’ and pharmacists’ perspectives driven by the theory of planned behavior. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21:903.
Google Scholar
Przymuszała P, Fabianowska S, Zielińska-Tomczak Ł, Cerbin-Koczorowska M, Marciniak R. Factors influencing behavioral intentions of graduating pharmacy students regarding interprofessional collaboration – a theory-driven qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23:1207.
Google Scholar
Przymuszała P, Turalska M, Zielińska-Tomczak Ł, Chmielewski A, Cerbin-Koczorowska M, Marciniak R. Theory of Planned Behavior as a theoretical framework for exploring nursing students’ intentions for interprofessional collaboration: a qualitative study. SAGE Open. 2024;14:21582440241284472.
Google Scholar
O’Reilly P, Lee SH, O’Sullivan M, Cullen W, Kennedy C, MacFarlane A. Assessing the facilitators and barriers of interdisciplinary team working in primary care using normalisation process theory: an integrative review. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0177026.
Google Scholar
Duchscher JEB. Transition shock: the initial stage of role adaptation for newly graduated registered nurses. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65:1103–13.
Google Scholar
Woollard M. The role of the paramedic practitioner in the UK. Australas J Paramed. 2006;4.
De Coninck L, Declercq A, Bouckaert L, Döpp C, Graff MJL, Aertgeerts B. The willingness and barriers to collaborate in the care of frail older adults: perspectives of primary care professionals. BMC Geriatr. 2023;23:488.
Google Scholar
Brandt SK, Essig S, Balthasar A. Zukünftige Ambulante Grundversorgung: Einstellungen und Präferenzen von Medizinal- und Gesundheitsfachpersonen ausgewählter Berufsgruppen. Neuchâtel: Schweizerisches Gesundheitsobservatorium; 2023.
Brandt SK, Föhn Z. Health2040. Health2040 – Preferences regarding future primary healthcare in outpatient settings. 2023. Accessed 27 Jun 2023.
Schenk M. Die MPA und MPK sind multitalentiert und interprofessionell. Prim Hosp Care. 2022;22:356–8.
Ansorg A-K, Jungo KT, Hilfiker E, Felber R, Trageser J, Arnet BP, et al. Quality of chronic care for patients with type 2 diabetes in practices with and without a clinical Specialized Medical Assistant (CSMA) – a cross-sectional study from Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2022. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2022.w30180.
Google Scholar
Josi R, De Pietro C. Skill mix in Swiss primary care group practices – a nationwide online survey. BMC Fam Pr. 2019;20:39.
Google Scholar
Alvarez RM, VanBeselaere C. Web-based survey. In: Kempf-Leonard K, editor. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement. New York: Elsevier; 2005. pp. 955–62.
Google Scholar
Ryan M, Watson V, Entwistle V. Rationalising the ‘irrational’: a think aloud study of discrete choice experiment responses. Health Econ. 2009;18:321–36.
Google Scholar
Allen MS, Iliescu D, Greiff S. Single item measures in Psychological Science. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2022;38:1–5.
Google Scholar
Kwon H, Trail G. The feasibility of single-item measures in sport loyalty research. Sport Manag Rev. 2005;8:69–88.
Google Scholar
Fuchs C, Diamantopoulos A. Using single-item measures for construct measurement in management research. DBW. 2009;69.
Dolbier CL, Webster JA, McCalister KT, Mallon MW, Steinhardt MA. Reliability and validity of a single-item measure of job satisfaction. Am J Health Promot AJHP. 2005;19:194–8.
Google Scholar
Fisher G, Matthews R, Gibbons A. Developing and investigating the use of single-item measures in Organizational Research. J Occup Health Psychol. 2016;21:3–23.
Google Scholar
Orme JG, Combs-Orme T. Regression with an Ordinal Dependent Variable. In: Orme JG, Combs-Orme T, editors. Multiple regression with Discrete Dependent variables. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009. p. 0.
Google Scholar
Liang J, Bi G, Zhan C. Multinomial and ordinal logistic regression analyses with multi-categorical variables using R. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:982.
Google Scholar
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2021.
BAG. Ärztinnen und Ärzte 2021. 2022. Accessed 10 Feb 2023.
BAG, Apothekerinnen, Apotheker. 2021. 2022. Accessed 25 Oct 2022.
Lobsiger M, Liechti D. Berufsaustritte und Bestand von Gesundheitspersonal in der Schweiz – Eine Analyse auf Basis der Strukturerhebungen 2016–2018. Neuchâtel: Schweizerisches Gesundheitsobservatorium; 2021.
Merçay C, Grünig A, Dolder P. Gesundheitspersonal in der Schweiz – Nationaler Versorgungsbericht 2021. Bestand, Bedarf, Angebot und Massnahmen zur Personalsicherung. Neuchâtel: Schweizerisches Gesundheitsobservatorium; 2021.
Merçay C, Burla L, Widmer M. Gesundheitspersonal in der Schweiz. Bestandesaufnahme und Prognosen bis 2030. Neuchâtel: Schweizerisches Gesundheitsobservatorium; 2016.
Jabbar S, Noor HS, Butt GA, Zahra SM, Irum A, Manzoor S, et al. A cross-sectional study on attitude and barriers to interprofessional collaboration in hospitals among health care professionals. Inq J Health Care Organ Provis Financ. 2023;60:00469580231171014.
Elsous A, Radwan M, Mohsen S. Nurses and physicians attitudes toward nurse-physician collaboration: a survey from gaza strip, palestine. Nurs Res Pract. 2017;2017:7406278.
Haddara W, Lingard L. Are we all on the same page? A discourse analysis of interprofessional collaboration. Acad Med. 2013;88:1509–15.
Google Scholar
Ten Cate O, Taylor DR. The recommended description of an entrustable professional activity: AMEE Guide 140. Med Teach. 2021;43:1106–14.
Google Scholar
Gummesson C, Alm S, Cederborg A, Ekstedt M, Hellman J, Hjelmqvist H, et al. Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for undergraduate medical education – development and exploration of social validity. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23:635.
Google Scholar
Bethlehem J. Selection Bias in web surveys. Int Stat Rev. 2010;78:161–88.
Google Scholar
Bauhoff S. Systematic self-report bias in health data: impact on estimating cross-sectional and treatment effects. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2011;11:44–53.
Google Scholar
Converse L, Barrett K, Rich E, Reschovsky J. Methods of observing variations in physicians’ decisions: the opportunities of clinical vignettes. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:586–94.
Google Scholar
Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA. 2000;283:1715.
Google Scholar
Kock F, Berbekova A, Assaf AG. Understanding and managing the threat of common method bias: detection, prevention and control. Tour Manag. 2021;86:104330.
Google Scholar
Pham T, Roy C, Mariette X, Lioté F, Durieux P, Ravaud P. Effect of response format for clinical vignettes on reporting quality of physician practice. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:128.
Google Scholar
Wang X, Cheng Z. Cross-sectional studies. Chest. 2020;158:S65–71.
Google Scholar
Human Research Act. SR 810.30 – Federal Act of 30 September 2011 on Research involving Human Beings (Human Research Act, HRA). 2014. Accessed 23 Mar 2023
link
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/LeahOC-531cb9a29fd548d3a7a1bdcda7ba4bc1.png "These Are the 7 Most Timeless Paint Colors")
